Cabarrus Cheap Seats

Spirited Discussion About Life in Cabarrus County, North Carolina

Politics in an Odd-Numbered Year XII (Part 2): Harold’s Mean Machine

August 1st, 2005 by Justin Thibault · No Comments

In “Let’s Talk About Cabarrus Politics”, Harold Smith’s magum opus, he covers a lot of ground. Out of all of the outrageous claims and scapegoating, the most frightening statement is the following in his “Action Plan” section:

Action two is to select the candidates who meet our criteria. I will ask the Executive Committee to come up with the criteria and make the selections.Action three is to support the selected candidates both financially and with campaign strategies. The Cabarrus Republican Men’s Club now has the ability to give financial support to local and state candidates. We have followed the guidance of the General Council of NC Republican Party and are properly registered with the NC State Board of Elections.

Action four is to work to get these candidates elected.

Here’s the deal: most of the people Harold Smith has a problem with are Republicans. He even ran against the current leadership of the Republican Party this year. He called the current leadership “liberals with a tax and spend agenda”. He was overwhelmingly defeated at the 2005 County Convention. He followed that up by working with Coy Privette to take over the Republican Men’s Club. So, the only way to get the people in office that they want are to take charge during the primary and non-partisan elections. This poses a bit of a problem since the Cabarrus County Republican Party is a political party - not a machine; and, clearly, Harold Smith is proposing setting up a machine to put people of his ilk in office.

Most people know machine politics as the classic “smoke filled room”. For the sake of this discussion, that image will do just fine. The questions the reader should ask are “How would a modern machine be different from the current system?” and “What’s the position of the Republican Party on this sort of thing?”

First Question: How would a modern machine be different from the current system?

Machine politics was prevalent earlier in the American history. Many of us learned about the Pendergast machine, Tammany Hall, and Daley. Basically, the machine controlled who got jobs and contracts within the government in exchange for votes and other political favors. Many laws and government policies prohibit graft and patronage jobs; but all appointments (County and City Manager, Department Heads, etc.) still have some political element to them.

A successful political machine could influence who gets hired into senior county staff positions by controlling political endorsements and the like. They could also have a strong influence on who gets county contracts for things like school and road construction. It doesn’t take much imagination to see how such a system could concentrate a tremendous amount of power into the hands of a few people with very little disclosure and even less accountability.

You’re probably thinking to yourself, “This isn’t Daley’s Chicago” or “This isn’t Pinochet’s Chile”. True, so let’s take what Harold Smith said in his Action Plan to its logical conclusion in both the Non-Partisan and Primary Election scenarios.

Non-Partisan Elections - Due to the emergence of the Republican Party in the South, Democratically-controlled North Carolina made many elections non-partisan in order to keep local Democrat office-holders safe from straight-ticket voters who identified more with the Republican nominees for President and US Congress. In these elections, the Republican party usually endorses whoever is a registered Republican running for the seat.

Now, consider the difference if a machine is controlling the process. In the event that five Republicans would be running for four seats, the party would identify all five. Of course, if only three of those five met special ideological “criteria” and got the endorsement - they would have a distinct advantage. In a county where 43% of the voters are registered Republicans, and where 63% of the straight-party tickets were Republican, the party’s endorsement would be critical to a win. So, if there’s a handful of people deciding the endorsement, then the candidates would simply be at the mercy of said handful.

Primary Elections - The current leadership of the Cabarrus Men’s Club belong(ed) to the Cabarrus County Taxpayers Association PAC (Political Action Committee). This PAC was heavily involved in the Primary Elections for County Commissioner and in the NC Legislature. The PAC had some successes in the late 90s; but in the last election Taxpayers Association candidates all lost.

Extending the Non-Partisan scenario to the Primary Elections is even scarier. If certain primary candidates are given even the smallest extra push ahead of their fellow party members by official party “bosses”, then that is nothing short of corruption of the primary process.

Second Question: What’s the position of the Republican Party on this sort of thing?

For Non-Partisan candidates, the North Carolina Republican Party’s Plan of Organization states the following in Article VII, Part A, Section 8:

    No County, Congressional District or State Committee of the North Carolina Republican Party shall offer an opportunity for a candidate for, or current office holder of, a “non-partisan office” who is not a Registered Republican to address a Republican Convention or other function sponsored by the North Carolina Republican Party or any of its subdivisions

And then there’s Article VII, Part I:

    In non-partisan elections, district and county executive committees shall have exclusive authority to endorse registered Republicans running in that district or county. Political subdivision executive committees (ie., County Executive Committee) shall not issue endorsements in non-partisan races unless the District resides entirely within the County. All members of the County Executive Committee may vote on the non-partisan endorsements for districts wholly encompassed within that county, regardless of whether Committee members live within the District in question.

In other words, only the Party leadership (and not some subset) can make endorsements.

As for Primary Elections, the rules are a little tighter. Article VII, Section G states:

    Each Officer and each Member of the State Executive Committee shall refrain from utilizing the powers and dignity of his or her office or position in any Republican Primary for public office at any level.

The County Plan of Organization doesn’t cover non-involvement Non-Partisan or Primary election; but it does state that its policies must line up with those of the State Party.

What you can do about this

First, raise awareness about this issue. You can send the link of this blog post to your friends by forwarding the URL or by using the “e-mail this post” option at the bottom of this post.

Second, you can e-mail or contact Cabarrus County Republican Party Leadership and voice your concerns.

Harold Smith and the Republican Men’s Club can carry out their action plan as long as they don’t involve local party leadership or give the impression of party endorsement to their “qualified” in non-partisan and, most importantly, primary elections. The more people that bring this up, the more likely that we’ll become the “Party of the Big Tent” and not the “Men’s Club Machine”

Category: Cabarrus Politics Tags: